Tag: Trending

  • The future of recruitment: Trends to watch by job seekers

    The future of recruitment: Trends to watch by job seekers

    The hiring market a senior professional will encounter over the next three years looks materially different from the one that existed before 2020. Processes are longer but more transparent, screening is more heavily automated at the top of the funnel and more human at the bottom, and employers are far more explicit about the skills they are buying. Understanding these shifts is the difference between running a frustrating search and running an efficient one.

    Skills-based hiring is displacing pedigree

    A growing proportion of employers have removed degree requirements from senior specifications and replaced them with demonstrable capability. This is genuinely good news for experienced professionals, but it changes what a CV needs to do. A chronological history of employers is no longer sufficient; the document has to make your capabilities legible in the first third of the first page. Lead with what you can do and what it produced, and let the employment history support it rather than carry it.

    AI screens the funnel, humans decide the outcome

    Most large employers now use some form of automated parsing before a human reads an application. The practical consequence is that clarity beats creativity in written materials: conventional section headings, the actual vocabulary of the job specification, and plain formatting all improve the likelihood of reaching a person. Once you reach that person, the reverse applies — final-stage decisions are more human and more values-driven than they were five years ago, because employers have learned how expensive a cultural mis-hire is.

    Hybrid work has become a negotiated term, not a policy

    The blanket remote-versus-office debate has largely resolved into role-by-role negotiation. For candidates this is leverage, but only if handled at the right moment. Raising location flexibility in a first conversation reads as a constraint; raising it once the employer has decided they want you reads as a detail to be solved. Sequence matters.

    Internal mobility is absorbing more senior roles

    Under cost pressure, employers increasingly fill senior positions internally and go to market only for genuinely scarce capability. Two implications follow. First, the externally advertised market understates real activity, so passive visibility matters more than active applying. Second, if you are currently employed, the fastest route to a bigger role may be a lateral internal move that adds a missing capability to your profile.

    Employer due diligence now runs in both directions

    Senior candidates research prospective employers with a rigour that would have seemed adversarial a decade ago, examining leadership turnover, funding position, employee sentiment and regulatory history. Employers have adjusted and now expect informed questions. Arriving without them is read as low engagement.

    What to do about all of this

    Concretely: rewrite your CV around capabilities and outcomes rather than duties; maintain a professional profile that is discoverable when you are not looking; build genuine relationships with two or three specialist recruiters in your sector rather than broadcasting to twenty; and prepare to be assessed on judgement rather than knowledge.

    Erdobar works with professionals across technology, finance, engineering, healthcare and public affairs in more than forty countries, and we are candid about fit even when the answer is that a role is wrong for you. If you would value an informed conversation about where your profile sits in the current market, explore our career counselling service.

  • Get recruiter’s insider tips for crafting the perfect resume

    Get recruiter’s insider tips for crafting the perfect resume

    A recruiter filling a senior role will typically review several hundred applications. The first pass on each one takes a matter of seconds, and it is not a careful reading — it is a search for three things: what this person does, at what level, and whether there is evidence they do it well. If those three things are not immediately locatable, the application is set aside regardless of the quality of the underlying career.

    What follows is what actually determines that outcome, from the perspective of the people making the decision.

    The top third of page one decides everything

    Most CVs waste their most valuable space on a generic profile paragraph. Replace it with four or five lines that state your discipline, your level, your sector context and two quantified achievements. A reader should be able to finish that block and know whether to continue. Everything below it exists to substantiate it.

    Write outcomes, not duties

    This is the single largest differentiator between CVs that progress and CVs that do not. “Responsible for managing the regional sales team” describes an assignment. “Led a team of fourteen across three markets, growing regional revenue from €8m to €13m in two years while reducing attrition from 24% to 9%” describes a professional. Where you cannot obtain exact figures, an honest approximation with context is far better than a vague duty. Aim for two or three quantified outcomes per substantial role.

    Use the employer’s vocabulary

    Automated parsing is a reality at most large employers, and it matches on terminology. If the specification says “talent acquisition” and your CV says “recruitment”, include both. This is not keyword stuffing, which is transparent and counterproductive; it is describing your experience in the language of the reader. Tailoring the top third and the skills section to each application takes fifteen minutes and changes response rates substantially.

    Length, format and the things that quietly cause rejection

    Two pages is correct for the large majority of senior professionals; three is defensible for academic, legal or research careers with publication records. Use a single clean typeface, conventional section headings, no columns, no tables, no graphics, no photograph unless local convention requires one, and submit as PDF unless another format is requested. Elaborate design fails parsers and signals unfamiliarity with the process.

    Explain gaps briefly and without apology — an unexplained two-year absence attracts far more suspicion than a one-line note about caring responsibilities, study or a deliberate break. Keep early-career roles to a single line each. Remove the objective statement, the marital status, the date of birth, the full home address and the phrase “references available on request”. Proofread twice and have someone else read it once, because a typo in the first three lines of a senior CV does real damage.

    Make the digital version match

    Recruiters will look at your professional profile before they contact you, and inconsistency between the two documents raises questions you do not want raised. Align dates and titles exactly, and ensure the profile headline states what you do rather than where you work.

    A final test

    Hand your CV to someone outside your field and give them thirty seconds. Then ask what you do, how senior you are and what you are good at. If they can answer all three, the document works. If they hesitate on any of them, the problem is structural rather than cosmetic.

    Erdobar reviews CVs as part of our career counselling service and will tell you candidly how yours reads to a hiring panel. Find out more.

Erbodar - Rethink Excellence
//
Julia
Julia
How can we help?